Games, Entertainment Ross Alexander Games, Entertainment Ross Alexander

Education Through Youtube (Part 2)

In my long-postponed "Education Through Youtube - Part 2", I highlight my favourite resources for learning about games. From experienced designer talks to guys like me who just happen to know how to put a great video together; this blog should have something for all fans of gaming.

maxresdefault (1).jpg

Making Up For Lost Time

 Most of the people who know me are very much aware that I am passionate about video games, and many of these people also know that I dropped out of a nursing course at University over a decade ago. My year-and-a-bit foray into nursing is the only taste of higher learning that I've had, having finished high school and not really being inspired to do anything afterwards. I knew that I liked to take care of people, and I am from a family of brilliant nurses (and a trained midwife) so it seemed like a sensible thing to do. The thought of actually working in the games industry felt unattainable, like being a rock star or an a-list actor.

 Looking back, I wish I could have drilled it into my teenage self that the cliché of "you can do anything you want, if you try hard enough" has its foundations in reality. Instead, I found myself spending my teens and early twenties doing bar work and retail; both of which have resulted in some great life lessons and friends that I am so proud to have. These jobs never gave me much opportunity to learn, though, and that was why I reached out to "Train2Game"; an open-learning course that turned out to be a bit of a joke. Despite the course's dubious credentials, it allowed me to put together the portfolio you see on this site, as well as giving me the confidence to apply for work in my chosen industry. I was willing to be vice-sub-assistant deputy teaboy, but luckily I was rewarded for my tenacity with a QA role and this crazy ride began.

 Every moment in my professional life since then has been a somewhat scattered ascent up the steep rock-face of "learning on the job". I love my current job, and if there's anyone who's thinking "I can't do <X> for a living", I want to let you know that if you care enough, you'll make it happen. My lack of formal education means relatively little in my current role, as does my growing up without a PC in the house for most of my childhood, as I've learned the role of QA tester over the past 4 and a half years. Despite this, I am constantly tripping myself up with imposter syndrome and the belief that my lack of technical or academic knowledge is going to define my whole career. It's a stupid insecurity, given that the games industry is already full of inspiring characters who have defeated much greater odds to achieve their goals.

 Anyway, the upshot of all of this is that I have been lucky enough to pick up some good habits from colleagues and fellow game developers who have shown me that especially in the tech world, nobody is ever finished learning. Books and seminars can be useful, but people go to great lengths to make learning the trade of game development more entertaining. This brings us to the whole point of this blog post (apologies for the introspective opening), the amazing channels that are out there that I feel have helped me to become a better game developer. I want to start with one that I've been following for quite a long time now, and has been a gateway to much wider sources of analysis.

As before, all titles will double as links to the appropriate Patreon pages.

Mark Brown & The Game Maker's Toolkit

JlSQuUdgqzYQoRcUuw7to5nwCMvphRVCgUVZ1OcOGiwSIGMKHCctzjygVloKUJux_large_2.jpeg

 Mark Brown is the first youtube channel I ever supported on Patreon, and this was largely because his Game Maker's Toolkit series was the first instance I had seen of critical analysis on specific gameplay mechanics and themes. Before this, I could see when a game had a problem with its mechanics or level design, but I couldn't ever convey it succinctly. I am not a trained level or mechanics designer, but GMT provided a lens through which to see the core tenets of modern game development and almost overnight, I became better at identifying a game's shortcomings and conveying them to other people. Some might think that this would be useful for a QA tester, and technically it is, but this insight is more useful when giving feedback, as opposed to writing bugs. Fortunately, I'm lucky enough to work somewhere that QA feedback is not only acknowledged, but actively encouraged, so I feel like this channel has equipped me well.

 Mark puts a great deal of work into his roughly 10-15 minute pieces, and not only is his voice a calming and well paced guide through the subjects he's discussing, but he also rewards his Patreon backers with a generous amount of "behind the scenes" content, video critiques of the games he's played that month and most valuable of all (to me): his reading list. 

 The GMT reading list is Mark's favourite articles, videos and essays about all sorts of subjects that can conceivably apply to gaming. Every month, he posts some solid gold that has led me to follow some of the video makers I'll mention later. Many of the articles he cherry picks are related to specific game mechanics, some are indie blogs that describe the process of making a game with a small team, there's a small selection of choice interviews with game developers great and small and some are really gratifying deep-dives into classic games from my childhood and teens.

 Whatever your chosen genre or area of expertise, I can almost guarantee you that Mark has made a video to suit your interests. I've never regretted kicking him a few quid for the work he does, and he always seems grateful. His work only continues to improve, and I look forward to the next series he makes.

Recommended Videos:

  1. The Last Guardian & The Language Of Games.
  2. Boss Keys - A Link to the Past's Dungeon Design.
  3. How Games Do Health.

 

Extra Credits

 The Extra Credits guys have been making educational videos for years now. They started as a channel solely dedicated to helping people understand how games are made and why developers often make choices that seem wrong or ill thought out. At this point, I doubt there's a part of game development that they haven't touched on. They've covered all genres, some more in depth than others, and while some of the lessons they convey may seem obvious, it's a great place to look for a video about getting started on your own game, why some games have stories that work while others fail, and even career advice for someone who wants to break into the industry.

 They've also branched out into teaching history, which was a treat for me. For those looking for the "game design" nuance in there, I'm afraid to say that it's 100% historical storytelling. That being said, a good designer reads fiction & non-fiction, takes trips and brings life experience to their project, so give some cutely drawn history a shot. Episodes are short and concise, with a distinctive and mostly consistent art style.

Recommended Videos:

  1. Design Club - Baldur's Gate: Durlag's Tower.
  2. Design Club - The Blue Shell.
  3. Overwatch & Asymmetric Character Design.

 

Tommy Thompson's AI & Games

large-logo-template1.png

 My countryman Tommy Thompson is a senior lecturer in computer science and researcher in AI. He also develops his own games. His knowledge of the driving forces behind AI makes for a very interesting insight into what makes game non-playable characters (NPCs) compelling to interact with. From the undeniably brilliant (albeit slightly inconsistent) Xenomorph AI in Alien Isolation, to the much lauded "game director" functionality of Left 4 Dead, AI & Games is a thought-provoking and never too technical insight into what makes our games more challenging and creative.

 His breakdowns of classic games known for their AI is the reason I keep coming back to watch his work. He is a prime example of an educator who can take a feature and boil it down to what makes it work and why sometimes it doesn't. Computers aren't as smart as humans...yet.

Recommended Videos:

  1. The Perfect Organism - The AI of Alien: Isolation.
  2. Resurrection & Reverence: The Return of DOOM.
  3. In The Director's Chair: The AI of Left 4 Dead.

 

Hamish Black's Writing On Games

eGGaellos35bV0wHg2It1jlh8s7J0Hz5CqUI00V3H6MJkErrItwgeZL1I9B0zWr9_large_2.jpeg

 Another fellow Scot (as if the name didn't give it away); Hamish Black has been recording a podcast about games for quite a while now, and has been making videos about writing in video games for a couple of years. Sometimes these take the form of critiques of specific games, while other times, they can focus on an aspect of interactive storytelling that Hamish finds especially valuable or troubling.

 As someone who enjoys writing blogs, fiction and interactive fiction, it's no surprise that the topics found on this channel often resonate strongly with me. I've always found Hamish's videos to be quite even-handed, and while I don't always agree with the points he's making, I feel like he always backs up his opinion, so I can at least see where he's coming from. With the game industry's long running "What's More Important: Story vs Mechanics" debate as strongly contested as ever, it's good to know that there's someone who cares enough about interactive narrative to keep putting out consistently solid content, which only seems to be getting better.

Recommended Videos:

  1. Wolfenstein: The New Order Is About More Than Defeating the Nazis.
  2. How the Meaning of Vanquish (and Spec Ops: The Line) Changed.
  3. The Witcher 3 and the Management of Narrative Scale.

Danny O'Dwyer's noclip Documentaries

My first time hearing Danny O' Dwyer was during my phase of listening to the GiantBombCast's ridiculous 3-hour long podcasts. I have since stopped listening to them as who has that sort of time to listen to a podcast every week? I digress. Danny is an extremely competent, well connected player (ho-ho!) in the games industry. His career has allowed him to make friends and interact with people that some might describe as the "rock stars" of modern game development. His channel "noclip" was set up in 2016, and the name refers to a type of video game cheat that allows players to walk through walls. This alludes to his ability to get inside the walls of big game studios to interview the people who make our favourite games.

 His first documentary was a behind-the-scenes of my favourite game of 2016, the great DOOM! He has since gone on to interview Marcin Iwinski of CD Projekt: one of the people behind my favourite game of 2015, The Witcher 3. He has a candid interview process that seems to get the best out of the people he's speaking with. I am really hoping that noclip's success allows Danny to bring the insides of great studios into the light.

Recommended Videos:

  1. DOOM Resurrected [Part 1] - To Hell & Back (DOOM Documentary).
  2. The Story of Rocket League (Part 1) - How To Build a Rocket.
  3. FINAL FANTASY XIV Documentary Part #1 - "One Point O"

 

Double Fine Adventure

DFA_Logo.jpg

Ok, I admit it. I love Tim Schafer to the extent that I have played through and loved most of his games, despite not actually enjoying the format of the typical adventure game. His inimitable writing style and sense of humour have pushed me through Grim Fandango, Monkey Island 1 & 2, as well as causing me to have Broken Age in my Steam list (I'm yet to get around to playing it.)

 I don't really do Kickstarters, but Double Fine's campaign to fund Broken Age was brilliantly marketed, to the extent that they went dramatically over budget. $3million over budget, actually. I may love Tim Schafer but I have no illusions about his slight...inexperience with managing a budget. The "Double Fine Adventure" showcased the process of pitching the idea of Broken Age to the general public, all the way through to release via highs, lows and E3 press conferences. Highlights include when the campaign was so successful that they broke Kickstarter as they broke $1m, sitting down with Peter Chan to look through his old art work and composing with Peter McConnell. With cameos from voice actors like Jack Black and Elijah wood, and interviews with Ron Gilbert and Tim Schafer, this is a must-watch for fans of Double Fine.

 For anyone who's curious about what it's like to develop a game, there's few examples better than 2 Player Productions' coverage of Broken Age's development. 

You can find the first video here.

 

GDC Talks

gdc-featured-1021x575.png

 I couldn't talk about using Youtube to learn game design without referencing possibly the greatest resource out there. The huge range of talks and presentations made at the Games Developers Conference (GDC).

 This catalogue of post-mortems, feature breakdowns, new development proposals and groundbreaking new ideas are an invaluable insight into how the best people in the industry are pushing us forward. From game design to AI programming, composing scores to compositing images; this is the place to find what you're looking for. 

 I have put this last, as most casual fans of videogames are less likely to be interested in an hour-long talk about a single feature in their favourite game, but some might. I know that as someone who wants to learn all he can about game development, this is a resource that I dip into regularly. I encourage anyone who's interested to have a look around the youtube vaults. There'll be something there for you.

Recommended Videos:

  1. Building Game Mechanics to Elevate Narrative in Oxenfree.
  2. Building Beauclair in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Blood and Wine.
  3. DOOM: Behind the Music.

 And that's it from me this time! If you made it to the bottom of the page, thank you for reading! I find that doing these blogs is a really good exercise for me, as I learn more about why I enjoy these channels. It also serves to highlight the benefits of thinking back on what you learned from watching a youtube video in your lunch break.

 This is just a select few of my favourite resources. I hope that maybe in the future, I'll be able to add more. For now, these are the highlights.

 Next time I blog, I will have probably celebrated 6 months in Sweden. So far, things are going great and I hope this continues for a long time. Avalanche has been a wonderful experience so far, and Stockholm is treating me well. I'll probably talk a bit about what I've been playing (including some rugby) and maybe throw in some movie or TV chat as well. Thanks again for reading!

Read More
Just Livin', Travel Ross Alexander Just Livin', Travel Ross Alexander

We're Going On An Adventure!

Months of effort pay off, and Kara and I begin to plan our route north. Excitement and terror await!

 I will admit that I have been neglecting this blog of late. I have been quite preoccupied since Christmas, due to a mixture of several issues, including an upsetting and prolonged family loss, my fragmented living arrangements and a seemingly never-ending stream of rejections from studios that I had hoped would open their doors. Believe it or not, I've been in a single continuous job hunt since July 18th 2016. My head has been all over the place, and it's made it very difficult to focus on my own personal projects, as many evenings have been spent refining cover letters, applying to companies across Europe and scouring corporate websites.

Back In The Saddle

 I am so very relieved to say that my time spent hunting has been rewarded, and that Kara and I are moving to Stockholm in Sweden, so that I can continue to pursue a career in game development as a QA Technician at Avalanche Studios. We are planning on a late March/ early April move so that Kara can attend her very first Scottish Tattoo Convention as an artist, and to give us time to prepare for a move of this magnitude. I've never lived abroad before, and Kara had never so much as set foot outside the UK until we visited Italy in 2014. We are both excited and terrified.

 This news comes less than a year after discovering that Reloaded was not only failing to send us to the USA, which we had been planning for since 2015; but I was losing my job. To describe the past 8 months or so as "tumultuous" seems to be an understatement. The paralysis of not being able to plan more than a month in advance had been banished and it was quite freeing, after more than a year of worrying about the move. Of course, it left me jobless and I set myself the task of getting back into the industry. After numerous rejections, I was finally able to get myself a job at eeGeo in Dundee, where I was lucky to be surrounded by a dedicated, considerate and friendly group of guys. While 3D mapping software was not the area of development that I wanted to progress, it did allow me to gain an understanding of a totally alien process, as well as refining and sharpening my QA skills. They came along at a time where I was really flagging and it gave me the confidence boost I needed to keep going with my hunt for a permanent games industry job.

 While Kara and I were on holiday in Girona, I received a missed call from a girl called Emma who worked at OPM recruitment, and she was wondering how my job hunt was getting on, asking me to get back in touch with her. I had previously not had much joy with recruiters, having only received one Skype interview that resulted in a "no". After our first phone call, Emma came back with two potential roles, one of which I am only now taking. She has been a positive force that played a pivotal role in not only helping me to secure this position, but she has counselled and generally steered my crazy paranoia out of the way so that we could focus on being the best candidate available. The entire process has lasted about 3 months, some of which has included long bouts of self-deprecation and doubt, as well as returning the stress of not being able to plan beyond a month in advance, as we waited to hear back from them. It is immensely satisfying to have that uncertainty lifted and to be free to plan for the future again.

 So now the plans are starting to form. It's going to be a tough month and a half, but with any luck, this new job is going to be the payoff after what I am personally calling "The Harshest Winter in Memory". I'd like to thank everyone who offered words of encouragement and hope. While it's often seen as the polite thing to do, the positivity has truly helped when I was feeling beaten down.

Read More
Games Ross Alexander Games Ross Alexander

Setting Sail For The Horizon

I explain a little bit about hunting for a job in the games industry before covering the games I've been playing recently! This post has Assassins, Demon Cowboys and Anti-Terrorism Agents. That's pretty cool, no?

Where's my head at?

The last month or so has been quite surreal for me. Back in July, I had a job within the games industry, following a path that I'd been able to find and cling to, while learning what I could about game design and production. Today marks the end of a period of constant stress and concern about my financial future as I try to find a job anywhere, from the tippity-top of the UK's game development scene to returning to my old stomping ground of high-street retail and bar work. I've been able to catch a toe-hold at the moment, and at least for the foreseeable future, I don't have to worry about the dole office.

I know that if you come here looking to read about games, this is perhaps a bit heavy and I apologise for that, but I promise that this is relevant. It will come as no surprise to most people reading this (if anyone still is) that my passion for videogames goes beyond a hobby. When my wife Kara convinced me to "go for it" and pursue my dream to become a game developer back in 2011, I threw myself heart & soul into working towards becoming a valuable asset to the kind of studio I'd like to work in, or maybe even start my own one day. I was fortunate enough to scramble my way out of the retail work I'd been doing since high school and got my foot in the door at a games studio. I've never wanted to look back since.

The past few weeks have been the first time I've ever had the feeling of true investment in a job hunt, with the aim being to pursue my career, as opposed to simply making enough to shelter and feed myself. It's simultaneously terrifying and exhilarating, as you weigh the pros and cons of working in certain places, all the while desperately hoping to hear back with good news from one of your many applications. I have had what can only be described as "mixed success" and while every rejection has been understandable, it pushes a person's impostor syndrome into overdrive as you attempt to predict what it was that made you fall short. Of course, this is the downside to being so truly invested in a job hunt; every rejection stings a little bit more than if it were for a job that was solely for monetary gain. On the other-hand, the feeling you get when you have positive feedback or an interview that seems to have gone well feels like a small step on the road to success, where success is getting back on course and with any luck, ending up slightly better-off than you were when you fell away.

So yeah, that's a small taste of where my mind's been at this past wee while. I really hope that I have some positive news to share with you guys in the near future, but for now; wish me luck.

Can we talk about games now?

Sure, let's leave my professional videogame chatter aside while I discuss my personal videogame experiences in the last couple of weeks, shall we? In the last post, I mentioned that I had been playing three games; Rainbow Six: Siege, Assassin's Creed: Rogue and Hard West. 

Cowboys + Satan = Hard West

Hard west is a strange game, for sure. I was sold on the concept while listening to (surprise surprise) an episode of an IGN games podcast, likening the gameplay mechanics to X-Com: Enemy Unknown, which was my #1 game of 2012. I had been waiting for it to drop in price, and then a friend was kind enough to purchase it as a birthday gift (thank you, Alice!) so I decided to spin it up and give it a shot.

Damn, this game's story and setting is bleak. It combines the general hostility and mercenary nature of living as a member of an early American settler in the west with the very acute hostility of satan himself. The player controls a character who dies and is resurrected on a mission of vengeance, vowing to destroy the people responsible for the death of...well himself, and his wife too. This grants him a certain set of supernatural powers, while he still does all his killin' at the end of a rifle/shotgun/six shooter. I'm not finished the game yet, but I thought I would give a quick rundown to anyone else who enjoys turn-based isometric strategy games (we really need to find a snappy word for that, don't we?) like X-Com or even Final Fantasy Tactics.

I think that the environment's aesthetic design is absolutely fantastic, with a range of locations that are straight out of the "gritty western playbook". There's saloons, farmsteads, sandy streets with wooden buildings on either side and plenty of cool props like horse troughs and barrels to take cover behind. While there's plenty of cover, the game uses a luck-based system to adjust your simulated dice rolls when attacking and defending yourself. It basically forces you to consider how focused you want to be on certain enemies, requiring you to reposition or hide your wounded characters as you attempt to pick off the stragglers. As enemy players shoot at your characters, their chances to hit will dictate how likely you are to take damage. If you take damage, then your luck will increase to compensate for the fact that you've already taken damage, and vice versa. I don't know why, but a game that openly displays its "luck factor" as a game mechanic has a tendency to make me feel like the outcomes of gunfights can be a bit arbitrary, but then again; nobody said the wild west was a fair place.

If you ever watched "Hang 'em High" and thought "You know what? They should have Clint Eastwood's character be a demon, hell-bent (pun intended) on vengeance!" then give Hard West a shot. (Pun not intended)

Breaking the siege

I love, love, love Rainbow Six Vegas 1 & 2. The last time I was able to properly dedicate myself to a small pool of games was when I was still in my late teens, living at home with my mum and working in a games shop as I tried (and failed) to save enough money to move in with friends in Edinburgh. It was the perfect cross-over of "Not enough money to buy more games" and "No real responsibilities in the evening" that allowed me to really sink my teeth into Rainbow 6 Vegas 1 & 2. I relished the opportunity to punish players who were coming from faster paced games, who weren't cautious, never expected traps and would find themselves running into a hail of gunfire from a concealed source behind a door. I got so good at playing the game that I could bounce an incendiary grenade off two surfaces and get people behind a door, just from listening to their footsteps on the floor above me.

So to come from that level of confidence in my own abilities to "pwn n00bs", I was brought crashing right back down to earth when I started playing Rainbow 6: Siege recently. Holy shit, there are players that know every nook and cranny of every map, and the array of gadgets that you can use and be forced to counter are wide-ranging and difficult to predict. I find myself getting gunned down in embarrassing situations, where I have camped a corner, as is an expected tactic for defenders in a Rainbow 6 game, then stood up to move down the corridor and have my head blown off by a guy who has had me zeroed in all this time. It's humbling, frustrating and it makes me really sad to think that there's no way I'm ever going to have the same amount of time to dedicate to Siege, the same way I did for the Vegas games.

The game itself is great, though. The maps are almost completely dynamic, with well appointed areas for destruction, that I haven't utilised so extensively since Battlefield 2:Bad Company. The gunplay is top-notch, as you might expect from a Tom Clancy game, and the Terrorist Hunt missions are as you probably remember them, although there's now a much heavier emphasis on objectives and multiplayer, but that just seems to be the way the games industry is moving these days. If you can get a crew together to play T-hunt, it's a good team building experience. Be warned however, the people that lurk around the multiplayer arenas are capable and they appear to be unusually well organised. I like to take "Sledge" who tellingly enough, is a burly Scottish guy whose special ability involves putting holes in walls with a giant sledgehammer. While I am capable of quite literally "making an entrance", it's often a case that any entrance I happen to make becomes host to a hailstorm of bullets, sending me sprawling to my death. Maybe I just ought to "get gud".

Going rogue felt like standing still

While I wouldn't go so far as to call myself an "Assassin's Creed Apologist", I remain a fan of the games despite some considerable design choices that leave me feeling burnt out half-way through. I found 3 to be an uphill slog, and Unity's beautiful rendering of Paris wasn't enough to negate the same game mechanics I've been using in the AC franchise for almost a decade now. AC4: Black Flag was a breath of fresh air, largely because it took players out into the sea to explore on a much grander scale, with epic ship battles that I would have paid for on their own.

With these factors in mind, I held off on playing AC: Syndicate (which I've heard lots of good things about) so I could play through Rogue, which seemed to be the red-headed stepchild of the franchise, as it was brought out on "last-gen consoles" while Unity was given the bigger marketing push. By all accounts, Rogue was basically a palette swap with Black Flag, trading the sunny climes of the Caribbean for the frigid waters of the north Atlantic and Arctic oceans. Unfortunately, Black Flag's protagonist Edward Kenway has also been replaced with Shay Patrick Cormack, an ex-assassin who has joined the Templar cause and sets out to restore order to the area by killing off members of his old cell.

It's the stark contrast between the life of a pirate like Kenway and the straight-laced and often unpleasant Cormack that made me pause to consider the differences between one game and the other. While the combat, environments and sailing are much the same as they were before, I found myself having a really hard time getting into the story. This was a shame as the story itself fills in some really interesting gaps in the Assassins vs Templar story, but it's just not enough to make me like Shay. His motives are seemingly coming from a benign place, and I suppose it's fair to say that his change in loyalties in the early game is a good microcosm of the differences between the two factions. Both want peace, but on their own terms and they're both entirely certain that the other is only going to hurt the human race if it gets its way.

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention the whole "employee at Abstergo entertainment" thing that forms the framework around the story in Rogue, in much the same was as it did during Black Flag. I know it's a super divisive framing mechanic, but as someone who dreams of working in a studio like that (sans the whole murder and genocide angle) I always found it super-cool to wander around Ubisoft Montreal's meta-version of itself. It plays much like the Black Flag meta campaign does, but with less oomph. Dialogue and animation has been replaced with hidden soundbytes, reducing engagement with the story in a way that makes the Abstergo offices seem a little...empty?

Anyway, I did enjoy Rogue for its ability to fill in little bits of story that had fallen away in the main AC plot, but for the most part the game suffers from a weaker central protagonist and modern-day story. The sailing and combat feels the same, and while it was super-fun to get out there on the high seas again, it felt like DLC as opposed to a new game. I'd recommend giving it a shot if you loved Black Flag and just want more of the same, with a little bit of back-story in there too.

That's all for this post, but I hope you guys enjoyed it. As always, any comments or feedback is valuable, but I am mostly writing these to chart my own thoughts.

Until next time, thanks for reading!

Read More
Games Ross Alexander Games Ross Alexander

Pokémon Go to your DOOM!

Pokémon, DOOM & Batman vs Superman all feature in my second pop-culture blog. 

Where's the gameplay at?

Where's the gameplay at?

So when I left off last time, I had mentioned that I would talk about Pokémon go for a little while. I have certainly dabbled in it a little bit, and while I have enjoyed little bits of it, I don't have the same pull that a lot of other people seem to be enjoying. For the four people left on earth who might not know, Pokémon Go is a game for your mobile phone where you are basically placed on a google-maps type environment, with varying levels of activity, depending on where you are in real life. As you move around in real-life, your avatar moves around on-screen and you are able to interact with Pokémon as they appear. This interaction is a simple minigame where the player is able to continually swipe up on their phone to throw the ubiquitous "Pokéball" at the creature while it performs a series of canned animations.

Once your prey is caught in its little red and white prison, you have added it to your roster. And that's pretty much it for gameplay, in the early stages at least. There are some RPG mechanics that sadly seem to involve mincing lower level Pokémon to create "candies" that help similar species of Pokémon to evolve into stronger versions of themselves, and there is the option to "battle" at gyms, where the game does a good job of reinforcing the same conditioning that many people get on games like Call of Duty or Halo; namely being put in your place by a 14 year old with a drugs reference in their title. In full disclosure, I only ever fought one guy in a gym, and it was at Livingston train station and the game didn't like it when my train started moving off, leaving me unable to fight further. I won, but I don't think I should have.

I would forgive you for assuming that this is a negative review of Pokémon Go, but I want to state at this point that I am curious to see what's going to happen with the game. I am almost certain that this is basically an open beta, as the distinct lack of fun gameplay that seems to have pushed the main series of Pokémon games into what must be its eighth or ninth generation is conspicuously absent, leaving behind the "gotta catch 'em all" element that seems to have entranced everyone, including my wife. I don't take any issue with the game, and for the most part, stories about it have been regarding how "Pokémon Go helped my autistic child make friends" or "I am a PTSD sufferer who finds it calming to take my children out to go Pokémon hunting" etc. This is all good, and hopefully getting a generation of nerds to go outside and interact socially will be something that prompts more games to encourage players to leave their home. My issues really come down to two things.

  1. I live in a little town in West Lothian, with little in the way of Pokéstops or gyms nearby, and I cycle a bike to get to the train station, so I can't have Pokémon go out while I'm travelling.
  2. Even with a range of respectable Pokémon in my roster, I don't feel like I can do much with them. There's just no gameplay there.

So with all of these factors considered, I decided to overcome 20 years of snobbery about Pokémon and I picked up "Pokémon Soul Silver" for my 3DS. I am only a couple of hours or so into it at the moment, and I still feel like the game has to "open up". I am at Violet City and just got my first gym badge, but I am worried that I've not balanced my training as my initial choice Pokémon is at least ten levels above the nearest other one. I may have to do some grinding to get my team up to speed. I promise to get back to you guys when I figure out if I was right to write-off one of the world's favourite and most famous gaming franchises of all time, or not.

Ok, so I'm not this far yet, but give me time.

Ok, so I'm not this far yet, but give me time.


Speaking of old franchises, I had mentioned last time that I had been thoroughly enjoying my time with this year's reboot of the grandaddy of first-person shooters: id Software's "DOOM". I tell ya what, this game was everything I'd been hoping for, in terms of gameplay, story (what little was there) and tone. Bethesda are presently 2-for-2 in terms of recent shooters, with Machine Games' 2014 "Wolfenstein: The New Order" having a solid single-player campaign that mixes a lot of FPS tropes with modern gameplay mechanics and leaves you satisfied that you've played a real videogame, and not just walked through a shooting gallery. For those who have followed games for a while, you'll know that Wolfenstein 3D and DOOM share a similar origin, both coming from the extremely influential id studio in the early nineties. Oddly enough, both games contain nods to their origins, with specific areas where players are able to step into original environments from their predecessors. The visual juxtaposition of the beautifully rendered modern weapons (which I'll get onto later) and the jagged sprites of the original environments certainly made me smile.

DOOM features these secret areas throughout the game.

DOOM features these secret areas throughout the game.

Not content to rest on its laurels, DOOM goes above and beyond any expectations I had when I first saw it being demoed at E3 last year. I think this is largely because this is a game that relies on how it feels to really make itself stand out. I touched on the speed and aggression that the game requires of you to succeed, with the player really needing to push forward when they're in trouble, instead of hiding. Enemies are smart and most of them are capable of chasing you anywhere you go, so it's best to turn around, pull out the chainsaw and run right at them, before enjoying the gory animation as you chop demons in half. This is especially enjoyable as the brief respite for the animation stops the player from being injured further. 

DOOM actually reminded me quite a lot of Bioshock Infinite, which is technically a great FPS, but it lacked the immediacy and punch that I feel I wanted from it. The original Bioshock was creepy to the point where it could justifiably be called a "horror" game, but in the case of Infinite, its admittedly fantastic story was so reliant on the environment being open and engaging that it never felt creepy, and the shooting became somewhat monotonous. Of course, this isn't what made me think of Bioshock Infinite, as DOOM has none of these traits, but both games share a similarity with regards to resource gathering. Ammo and health must be scavenged if you're going to survive either game, but where Bioshock Infinite has you literally raking in bins for old apples to restore health, DOOM makes a game of running around the environment mid-gunfight to pick up that vital bit of health or armour as you flee (let's say fighting retreat) from a "Baron Of Hell".

A "Baron Of Hell". These guys take some putting down.

A "Baron Of Hell". These guys take some putting down.

This "micro-gamification" permeates everything that makes DOOM great. At no part of the game are you bored, feeling like you're missing something or ought to break up your exploration. There's always something to do, from the unobtrusive and rewarding puzzles that scatter the environment, to checking off the map-specific challenges: "Perform 5 screw-top glory kills on possessed." The combat related challenges often force you to re-think your approach, trying to get certain enemy types to move with you in a certain direction while you desperately hunt for the right weapon to complete the challenge, or declining to use your area-of-effect weapons for risk of killing an enemy too early to complete the challenge. Combine this constant need to switch-up your strategy with top-notch level design, weapon mechanics and baddie balancing to craft a masterpiece of exciting and gory gunplay, and after all that, what else could you want?

The aesthetic design twists wildly from creepy and demonic (above) to sci-fi futuristic.

The aesthetic design twists wildly from creepy and demonic (above) to sci-fi futuristic.

If you want a story, it's...ok. It's certainly functional, and to be honest maybe DOOM wouldn't hold up as well if you made the DOOM Marine any more than a mindless gun-toting maniac. The UAC reprises its role as an openly evil corporate entity, with little datapads telling its employees that "unlike the rest of your life, the stuff you do here is important" and openly channeling "argent energy" directly from hell, all while they send research teams to their deaths and perform augmentations on demons to make them...well...it makes for better level bosses, let's leave it at that, shall we? Like I said, looking into the motives of a character in a DOOM game probably won't go very well. DOOM does its best storytelling through its environments, and there's no doubt that the art team must have trawled through some especially disturbing artwork to get the ideas for the settings. From futuristic planet-sized computer cores that are infested with demons, to biblical looking hellscapes and back to scientific martian colonies with clumps of demonic goop and human body parts, you know things aren't going well for the locals. Hiding in a locker isn't going to help you here ("Alien: Isolation" may have conditioned me to always look for a hiding place in a dystopian sci-fi environment) so you best just keep running forward, chainsaw raised and trusty shotgun loaded. You'll have a blast.


Lastly, I want to talk about Batman vs Superman:Dawn of Justice.

I know, I know. It's "not great", but it's not all that bad either. It pulled back quite a bit from Man Of Steel's reliance on grand-scale sweeping combat to make its points, although there's certainly plenty of OTT fight scenes that will dazzle with special effects. The opening scene features an overlapping story with MoS, with Affleck's Bruce Wayne driving through Metropolis while Superman and Zod fight overhead, bringing down skyscrapers and rubble. It does a good job of juxtaposing the "small man" of Batman, on the ground and trying to help people while the "big guys" fight up in the sky.

Affleck's Bruce Wayne is pretty good, and it has to be; as he carries the movie.

Affleck's Bruce Wayne is pretty good, and it has to be; as he carries the movie.

With so much of the movie spoiled for me in trailers (I won't go any further into details), I already knew the major story beats for this film before I watched it. The combination of "knowing what's coming", along with reading the pretty poor reviews made this a "wait until it's on TV" movie for me, and while it might have been nice to see the big action scenes on a cinema screen, I feel like I enjoyed the film more with my expectations tempered slightly. The performances are all pretty good, with Affleck stealing the show for me. Henry Cavill's Clark Kent/Superman (Spoilers, sorry!) is everything I dislike about Superman as he gets outsmarted by everyone that meets him. Jesse Eisenberg is a great villain, for sure. He's just the right amount of slimy, creepy and psychopathic to make Lex Luthor work, and while she's mostly a mystery, Gal Gadot's WonderWoman looks great on screen. I guess we'll see how her Diana Prince turns out in her stand-alone movie which looks frickin' awesome, based on the new trailer from SDCC.


That's all for this week. If you made it down this far, thank you for reading and hopefully you'll join me next time when I discuss some of the books I've been enjoying lately, due to my recent decision to join Audible, and I might have made some progress with Pokémon Soul Silver. I'm still not sure what will fill the hole left by DOOM, but I am considering giving the multiplayer a shot.

Until then, goodbye and thanks for stopping by!

 

Read More